Jump to content

archive.today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Internet Archive.
For guidance on the resolution of links to archive.today or its mirrors, see Wikipedia:archive.today guidance

archive.today
Screenshot of the archive.today home page
Type of site
Web archiving
Available inMultilingual
URL
  • archive.today
  • archive.fo
  • archive.is
  • archive.li
  • archive.md
  • archive.ph
  • archive.vn
  • archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion Tor network(Accessing link help)[note 1]
RegistrationNo
Launched16 May 2012; 13 years ago (2012-05-16)[note 2]

archive.today (also known as archive.is, among other domains) is a web archiving website that saves snapshots on demand. It has support for JavaScript-heavy sites such as Google Maps and X.[1] archive.today records two snapshots: one replicates the original webpage including any functional live links; the other is a screenshot of the page.[2]

The website has come under scrutiny from many governments starting in the late 2010s, including bans in China and Russia and in 2025 U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subpoenaed a domain registrar to identify the owner of archive.today's domain name.

History

[edit]

archive.today was founded in 2012 as a web archive. It allegedly registered its trademark in the Czech Republic in 2013.[3] The site originally branded itself as archive.today, but changed the primary mirror to archive.is in May 2015.[note 3] It began to deprecate the archive.is domain in favor of other mirrors in January 2019.[note 4] According to the archive.today blog, the website had saved about 500 million pages by 2021,[note 5] 700 terabytes in total size.[4]

In July 2013, archive.today began supporting the API of the Memento Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory.[5][6] Due to budget constraints at LANL, the Memento Project was disestablished in September 2025.[7] Archive.today was one of the last major active users of the Memento protocol following the project's downsizing.[8] The closure of the Memento infrastructure at LANL in September 2025 came amid a broader period of increased scrutiny for the service.

The Russian independent media outlet Mediazona uses website to preserve social media profiles and posts of Russian servicemen killed in the Russo-Ukrainian war, as part of its Russia 200 project, a named database of confirmed Russian military casualties compiled jointly with the BBC Russian Service and a team of volunteers.[9] Individual profile pages on 200.zona.media link to snapshots of social media posts by relatives, obituaries in local media, and other open-source evidence used to verify each death.

In early 2023, a team of researchers at the University of Amsterdam identified archive.today as the most-used open-access archiving service among fact-checking organisations, based on the European Digital Media Observatory [it]'s dataset on the Russo-Ukrainian war.[10][11]

In August 2023, Jani Patokallio published an investigation on his blog Gyrovague regarding archive.today's funding sources and the founder's identity.[12] The founder tends to believe that the Patokallo family’s increased interest is linked to how the archive.today website is being used in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war.[note 6]

On 30 October 2025, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subpoenaed archive.today's domain registrar, Tucows. The subpoena stated its purpose was to identify the owner(s) of the archive.today domain name, and that it was part of a criminal investigation conducted by the FBI, the nature of which was not disclosed.[13][14] The Catalan daily Ara interpreted the action as part of a campaign to selectively criminalize anonymous digital archives reliant on micro-donations (such as Anna's Archive, eliminated by Google from its search results), even though industrial datasets used for training large language models (such as the Common Crawl, financed by OpenAI and Anthropic) also fail to compensate content creators and owners.[4] News coverage of the subpoena mentioned Patokallio's report, where Patokallio has said there were "several indications" the founder was based in Russia.[12]

In November 2025, the DNS provider AdGuard DNS reported that it had been pressured by a French organization calling itself Web Abuse Association Defense (WAAD) to block archive.today and its mirror domains. WAAD alleged that archive.today had refused to remove child sexual abuse material since 2023, invoking French LCEN law to demand action. AdGuard DNS contacted archive.today directly and reported that the flagged content was promptly removed upon notification, and that archive.today stated it had never received prior complaints about those URLs. AdGuard's investigation found that WAAD was a recently registered association with minimal public presence, and described the complaints as suspicious, noting evidence of possible impersonation of a real French lawyer in prior similar complaints sent to other companies. AdGuard announced it would file a criminal complaint with French police.[15][16]

Screenshot of LibreWolf's developer tools on the "Network" tab, with multiple automated connections to "gyrovague.com" made by a JavaScript script (all of them are blocked by uBlock Origin browser extension)
Screenshot of archive.today performing a DDoS attack on gyrovague.com

On 8 January 2026, Patokallio's hosting provider Automattic notified him that it had received a GDPR complaint from a person identifying herself as "Nora". The complaint alleged that the 2023 Gyrovague investigation "contains extensive personal data… presented in a narrative that is defamatory in tone and context." After Patokallio submitted a rebuttal, Automattic sided with him and left the post up.[17] Subsequent investigation suggested that "Nora" was likely an appropriated identity — the name belonged to either a real person or a trademark of a clothing brand, whose only connection to archive.today had been a prior content takedown request.[18][17] On 10 January 2026, the archive.today webmaster sent Patokallio an email asking him to temporarily remove the 2023 post; when Patokallio declined, the DDoS attack began several days later.[17]

On 14 January 2026, it emerged that archive.today had modified its CAPTCHA page to discretely send repeated requests to Gyrovague, thereby causing visitors to unwittingly contribute to a DDOS attack against the blog. A Tumblr account seemingly associated with archive.today had recently posted several public criticisms of Patokallio. Emails released by Patokallio show archive.today requesting the temporary removal of his report and later threatening him with AI pornography.[12] On 20 February 2026, the English Wikipedia banned links to archive.today, citing the DDoS attack and evidence that archived content was tampered with to insert Patokallio's name.[18] The decision was made despite concerns over maintaining content verifiability[18] while removing and replacing the second-largest archiving service used across the Wikimedia Foundation's projects.[19] The Wikimedia Foundation had stated its readiness to take action regardless of the community verdict.[18][19] Patokallio expressed his satisfaction with the outcome.[3]

During the community discussion, editors discovered that archive.today's operator had tampered with archived snapshots of webpages. In captures of a blog post related to the "Nora" pseudonym, the operator had replaced instances of "Nora" with "Jani Patokallio", including in comment fields that previously read "Comment as: Nora [surname]".[18] The alterations were subsequently reverted. The discovery was cited as a key factor in the blacklisting decision, as it undermined the premise that archived snapshots were faithful reproductions of the original pages.[18]

This was not the first time Wikipedia had restricted links to archive.today. In 2013, the community blacklisted archive.is, citing concerns about botnets, linkspamming, and the opaque manner in which the site was operated. The decision was overturned in 2016 following a new request for comment, and archive.today was removed from the spam blacklist. At the time of the 2026 ban, the site was the second-largest archiving service used across all Wikimedia Foundation projects, with over 695,000 links spread across approximately 400,000 pages.[18]

Features

[edit]

Archiving

[edit]

archive.today can capture individual pages in response to explicit user requests.[20][21][note 7] Since its beginning, it has supported crawling pages with URLs containing the now-deprecated hash-bang fragment (#!).[note 8] The website records only text and images, excluding XML, RTF, spreadsheet (xls or ods) and other non-static content. However, videos for certain sites, like Twitter, are saved.[note 9] It keeps track of the history of snapshots saved, requesting confirmation before adding a new snapshot of an already saved page.[22][note 10] Once a web page is archived, it cannot be deleted directly by any Internet user.[note 11] Users can download archived pages as a ZIP file, except pages archived since 29 November 2019,[note 12] when archive.today changed their browser engine from PhantomJS to Chromium (non-headless).[note 13] archive.today does not obey robots.txt because it acts "as a direct agent of the human user."[note 7]

Pages are captured at a browser width of 1,024 pixels. CSS is converted to inline CSS, removing responsive web design and selectors such as :hover and :active. Content generated using JavaScript during the crawling process appears in a frozen state.[note 14] HTML class names are preserved inside the old-class attribute. When text is selected, a JavaScript applet generates a URL fragment seen in the browser's address bar that automatically highlights that portion of the text when visited again.[citation needed] Web pages can be duplicated from archive.today to web.archive.org as second-level backup, but archive.today does not save its snapshots in WARC format. The reverse—from web.archive.org to archive.today—is also possible,[note 15] but the copy usually takes more time than a direct capture.

Archive of a Wikipedia webpage by archive.today on 5 January, 2026

While saving a page, a list of URLs for individual page elements and their content sizes, HTTP statuses and MIME types is shown. This list can only be viewed during the crawling process.[citation needed] Removing advertisements, popups or expanding links from archived pages is possible by asking the owner to do it on his blog.[note 16]

According to the site's FAQ, archive.today's storage layer runs on Apache Hadoop and Apache Accumulo, with all data stored on the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS). Textual content is replicated three times across servers in two data centers, both located in Europe, with at least one hosted by the French provider OVH; images are replicated twice.[note 7] The site does not store snapshots in WARC format.[note 7]

The scraping component has used a modified version of the Chromium browser since November 2019, replacing the previous PhantomJS-based engine.[note 7]

[edit]

The research toolbar enables advanced keywords operators, using * as the wildcard character. Paired quotation marks address the search to an exact sequence of keywords present in the title or in the body of the webpage, whereas the insite operator restricts it to a specific Internet domain.[note 17] While saving a dynamic list, archive.today search box shows only a result that links the previous and the following section of the list (e.g. 20 links for page).[note 18] The other web pages saved are filtered, and sometimes may be found by one of their occurrences.[22][clarification needed] The search feature is backed by Google CustomSearch. If it delivers no results, archive.today attempts to utilize Yandex Search.[note 19]

Bypassing paywalls

[edit]

archive.today is frequently used to bypass paywalls on news websites, similarly to the defunct service 12ft.[23]

[edit]

The practice of sharing archive.today links to circumvent paywalls has sparked legal and ethical debate in Europe. In the Netherlands, journalist Peter Aanzee publicly challenged a physician who shared an archive.ph link to one of his paywalled articles in De Volkskrant, arguing that distributing archived copies constituted copyright infringement.[24] The discussion drew on European Court of Justice jurisprudence on hyperlinking, particularly the 2016 GS Media v Sanoma ruling, which established that linking to illegally published content can constitute a copyright violation if the linker knew or ought to have known of the illegality — a presumption that applies automatically to parties acting for profit.[24]

The largest Dutch publisher, DPG Media, acknowledged that archive.today is "a thorn in the side of many publishers (and journalists)" but noted that enforcement is difficult because the site is operated anonymously, hosted across multiple servers that frequently change location, and resurfaces under new domains when one is taken down.[24]

Comparison with Internet Archive

[edit]

Commentators have contrasted archive.today with the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. The same paywalled Volkskrant article shared via archive.ph was also found archived in the Wayback Machine, demonstrating that both services can be used to circumvent paywalls.[24] Like the Wayback Machine, archive.today does not advertise paywall circumvention among its stated features; the ability to bypass paywalls is a byproduct of its core function of archiving web pages as they appear to visitors.[24]

AI agents

[edit]

A 2025 investigation by journalist Henk van Ess found that AI chatbots — including ChatGPT, Perplexity AI, Grok, and Claude — exploit web archives to bypass paywalls during live web searches.[25] In one documented case, ChatGPT retrieved a full article from The Economist via archive.today and then generated a five-point economic analysis in the publication's characteristic style and terminology.[25] Van Ess identified six distinct methods of paywall circumvention by AI systems, of which "archive exploitation" — finding archived copies on services such as archive.today and the Internet Archive — was the most direct.[25] Unlike documented concerns about AI training unpaywalled content, this behaviour involves real-time retrieval through archived copies during individual queries, effectively extending paywall circumvention beyond human users to automated agents.[25]

Academic research

[edit]

A 2018 study by researchers at University College London, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Cyprus University of Technology, published at the AAAI International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), analysed 21 million URLs from archive.is's live feed and 356,000 archive.is URLs shared on Reddit, Twitter, Gab, and 4chan's /pol/ board over 14 months.[26] The study found that news articles and social media posts were the most commonly archived content types, likely due to their "perceived ephemeral and/or controversial nature."[26]

The researchers documented that archive.is URLs were extensively shared on "fringe" communities such as 4chan's /pol/ board and the Reddit subreddit r/The_Donald, both to preserve potentially contentious content and to deny ad revenue to news outlets perceived as ideologically opposed.[26] Moderation bots on r/The_Donald automatically blocked direct links to certain news sites — for example, 46% of links to the New York Daily News were censored — and prompted users to post archive.is URLs instead.[26] The authors estimated that The Washington Post lost approximately US$70,000 per year in ad revenue due to the practice of sharing archived copies rather than direct links on Reddit alone.[26]

On Reddit, bots were responsible for posting 44% of archive.is links and 85% of Wayback Machine links across the studied subreddits, driven by moderators aiming to mitigate link rot.[26]

Worldwide availability

[edit]

Australia and New Zealand

[edit]
See also: Internet censorship in Australia and Internet censorship in New Zealand

In March 2019, the site was blocked for six months by several internet providers in Australia and New Zealand in the aftermath of the Christchurch mosque shootings in an attempt to limit distribution of the footage of the attack.[27][28]

China

[edit]
See also: Internet censorship in China

According to GreatFire.org, archive.today has been blocked in mainland China since March 2016,[29] archive.li since September 2017,[30] archive.fo since July 2018,[31] as well as archive.ph since December 2019.[32]

Finland

[edit]
See also: Internet censorship in Finland

On 21 July 2015, the operators blocked access to the service from all Finnish IP addresses, stating on Twitter that they did this in order to avoid escalating a dispute they allegedly had with the Finnish government.[33][34]. Since the conflict with the Finnish blogger the website displays unpassable captcha to visitors from Finland[35].

Russia

[edit]
See also: Internet censorship in Russia

In 2016, the Russian communications agency Roskomnadzor began blocking access to archive.is from Russia.[36][37][34]

On 23 March 2026, archive.today and several mirror domains were blocked by Russian authorities.[38]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ @archiveis (30 October 2019). "a current list of all tor domains and clear net domains" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  2. ^ "When did the Archive-is site originally launch?". Archive.today Blog. 18 February 2014 – via Tumblr. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ "Why did you change the URL back from archive-today to archive-is?". Archive.is Blog. 3 May 2015. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. ^ @archiveis (4 January 2019). "Please do not use archive.IS mirror for linking, use others mirrors [.TODAY .FO .LI .VN .MD .PH]. .IS might stop working soon" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 6 January 2019 – via Twitter.
  5. ^ "What percentage of 5-char-codes is used now? [...]". Archive.is blog. Tumblr. 3 September 2021. Archived from the original on 29 January 2026. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
  6. ^ "Ladies and gentlemen, [...]". Blog of http://archive.today/. 26 January 2026.
  7. ^ a b c d e "Archive.today FAQ". archive.today.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  8. ^ "Home page of Archive.is in 2013". {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  9. ^ "Have you considered allowing small mp4s [...]". Archive.is blog. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  10. ^ "Example snapshot history on archive.is".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  11. ^ "Some Frequently Asked Question". Archive.today Blog. 24 January 2013 – via Tumblr. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  12. ^ "The "download zip" button has been giving a "Not found" error for quite some time". Archive.is blog. 17 July 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  13. ^ "What scraper or headless browser are you using? it works so well". Archive.is blog. 20 May 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  14. ^ JavaScript-generated loading animation of Dailymotion video https://archive.today/20200121182128/https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3sexy8 appearing in a frozen state
  15. ^ See, for example, [1], an archive.today save of an Internet Archive snapshot of Spanish Wikipedia's home page.
  16. ^ "Example user request on the Archive.is blog". Archive.is blog. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  17. ^ For example, the string insite: https://en.wikipedia.org "World Cup" returns the https://archive.today/search/?q=insite%3A+http%3Aen.wikipedia.org+ "World+Cup"/ related snapshots
  18. ^ Example of dynamic list: "au:"thomas aquinas"". WorldCat. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  19. ^ "Just realized that I can search for keywords in the search bar for archive today, was this a recently added feature?". Archive.is. 18 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Brinkmann, Martin (22 April 2015). "Create publicly available web page archives with Archive.is". Ghacks. Archived from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
  2. ^ Brunelle, Justin F.; Kelly, Mat; Weigle, Michele C.; Nelson, Michael L. (25 January 2015). "The impact of JavaScript on archivability" (PDF). International Journal on Digital Libraries. 17 (2): 95–117. doi:10.1007/s00799-015-0140-8. S2CID 8433375. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 May 2019.
  3. ^ a b McCurdy, Will (21 February 2026). "Wikipedia Blacklists Archive.today Links Over Alleged DDoS Attack on Blogger". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 21 February 2026. Retrieved 2 March 2026.
  4. ^ a b Cuesta, Albert (15 November 2025). "L'FBI, a la caça del web arxivat que incomoda els mitjans". Ara (in Catalan). Archived from the original on 17 November 2025. Retrieved 2 March 2026.
  5. ^ Nelson, Michael L. (9 July 2013). "Archive.is Supports Memento". Research and Teaching Updates. Web Science and Digital Libraries Research Group at Old Dominion University. Archived from the original on 27 July 2013. Retrieved 17 September 2013.
  6. ^ "archive.is". Memento Protocol Information. Memento Development Group. Archived from the original on 15 September 2013. Retrieved 17 September 2013.
  7. ^ Taylor, Nicholas (7 August 2025). "Memento TimeTravel sunset". memento-dev (Mailing list). Archived from the original on 18 August 2025. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  8. ^ Taylor, Nicholas (7 August 2025). "Memento TimeTravel sunset". Memento Development Group. Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  9. ^ "Russian losses in the war with Ukraine. Mediazona count, updated". Mediazona. Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  10. ^ "Losing our memory of fake news". Community Research and Development Information Service. 24 February 2023. Archived from the original on 9 December 2025. Retrieved 2 March 2026.
  11. ^ Porcellini, Valentin. "Mapping the "memory loss" of disinformation in fact-checks: the challenge of preserving disinformation traces". vera.ai. Archived from the original on 26 January 2023. Retrieved 2 March 2026.
  12. ^ a b c Brodkin, Jon (10 February 2026). "Archive.today CAPTCHA page executes DDoS; Wikipedia considers banning site". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 10 February 2026. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
  13. ^ Koebler, Jason. "FBI Tries to Unmask Owner of Infamous Archive.is Site". 404 Media. Archived from the original on 6 November 2025. Retrieved 6 November 2025.
  14. ^ Kirchner, Malte (5 November 2025). "Archive.today: FBI Demands Data from Provider Tucows". heise.de.
  15. ^ Meshkov, Andrey (13 November 2025). "Behind the complaints: Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive.today". AdGuard DNS Blog. Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  16. ^ "AdGuard DNS publishes investigation results revealing that the organization pressuring Archive.today is highly suspicious". GIGAZINE. 17 November 2025. Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  17. ^ a b c Brodkin, Jon (10 February 2026). "Archive.today CAPTCHA page executes DDoS; Wikipedia considers banning site". Ars Technica. Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Brodkin, Jon (20 February 2026). "Wikipedia blacklists Archive.today, starts removing 695,000 archive links". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 20 February 2026. Retrieved 20 February 2026.
  19. ^ a b Lewczuk, Maciej (11 February 2026). "Archive.today zamienił użytkowników w nieświadomych hakerów. Wikipedia reaguje na atak DDoS". PurePC (in Polish). Archived from the original on 11 February 2026. Retrieved 2 March 2026.
  20. ^ Dascalescu, Dan (18 February 2013). "Web page archiving". Dan Dascalescu's Wiki. Archived from the original on 22 September 2013. Retrieved 3 October 2013.
  21. ^ Koebler, Jason (29 October 2014). "Dear GamerGate: Please Stop Stealing Our Shit". Motherboard. Archived from the original on 1 February 2026. Retrieved 22 March 2017. There is no way for a website to protect itself from having an Archive.today user mirror the site.
  22. ^ a b Occhipinti, Kris (15 April 2016), Archiving Websites with the Archive.is, archived from the original on 27 January 2022, retrieved 27 January 2022 – via YouTube
  23. ^ "12ft Ladder Stopped Working? Here Are the 5 Best Alternatives". Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  24. ^ a b c d e Aanzee, Peter (7 September 2025). "Is het gebruik van Archive.today illegaal?". Netkwesties (in Dutch). Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  25. ^ a b c d Van Ess, Henk; Aanzee, Peter (20 July 2025). "Hoe AI-bots stilletjes aan zoekers gratis artikelen kunnen bieden". Netkwesties (in Dutch). Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  26. ^ a b c d e f Zannettou, Savvas; Blackburn, Jeremy; De Cristofaro, Emiliano; Sirivianos, Michael; Stringhini, Gianluca (2018). "Understanding Web Archiving Services and Their (Mis)Use on Social Media" (PDF). Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 12 (1). doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15018. Retrieved 27 April 2026.
  27. ^ Chen, Caleb (19 March 2019). "ISPs in AU and NZ start censoring the internet without legal precedent". Private Internet Access. Archived from the original on 28 April 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2019.
  28. ^ Menegus, Bryan (19 March 2019). "New Zealand ISPs Say They're Blocking Sites That Fail To Remove Christchurch Shooting Video". Gizmodo Australia. Archived from the original on 18 May 2019. Retrieved 20 March 2019.
  29. ^ "archive.is is 100% blocked in China". GreatFire Analyzer. 12 August 2018. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  30. ^ "archive.li is 100% blocked in China". Great Fire Analyzer. 12 August 2018. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  31. ^ "archive.fo is 100% blocked in China". Great Fire Analyzer. 12 August 2018. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  32. ^ "archive.ph is 100% blocked in China". en.greatfire.org. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  33. ^ Lapintie, Lassi (22 July 2015). "Suomalaisilta estettiin haktivistien suosimalla verkkosivulla käynti" [Finns' access to website used by hacktivists blocked]. Iltalehti (in Finnish). Archived from the original on 27 May 2019. Retrieved 4 March 2016.
  34. ^ a b Toler, Aric (22 February 2018). "How to Archive Open Source Materials". bellingcat. Archived from the original on 17 August 2025. Retrieved 17 February 2026.
  35. ^ "Internet | Suomalaismies suututti suositun verkkopalvelun ja joutui hyökkäyksen kohteeksi". 20 March 2026.
  36. ^ Elistratov, Vladimir (29 January 2016). "Roskomnadzor zablokiroval servis archive.is, khranyashchiy kopii veb-saytov" Роскомнадзор заблокировал сервис archive.is, хранящий копии веб-сайтов. TJournal (in Russian). Archived from the original on 30 August 2017. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
  37. ^ Cushing, Tim (4 February 2016). "Russia Blocks Another Archive Site Because It Might Contain Old Pages About Drugs". Techdirt. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
  38. ^ Whittaker, Zack (23 March 2026). "Russian authorities block paywall removal site Archive.today". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 23 March 2026. Retrieved 23 March 2026.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons logo
Wikimedia Commons has media related to archive.today.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archive.today&oldid=1353229699"